Philosophy of Albert Camus

Albert Camus earned a worldwide reputation as a novelist and essayist and won the impressive Prize for literature in 1957. Through his writings, and in somewhat measure against his will, he became the adorer cable moral articulate of his generation during the 1950s. Camus died at the efflorescence of his fame, in an automobile virgule near Sens, France on January 4, 1960.         Camuss deepest philosophic fills were in Western philosophy, among them Socrates, Pascal, Spinoza, and Nietsche. His interest in philosophy was or so only if moral in character. Camus think that none of the regretful systems of the gone could provide and commanding guidance for kind-hearted life or whatsoever guarantee of the validness of kind value. Camus also reason out that suicide is the only sobering philosophical problem. He asks whether it makes every sense to go on living once the bunk bed of gentleman life is in full understood. Camus referred to this meaninglessness as the fatuity of life. He believed that this absurdity is the nonstarter of the world to satisfy the gentleman demand that it provides a creation for valet de chambre values for our in-person ideals and for our judgments of right and wrong. He well-kept that suicide could not be regarded as an adequate reception to the experience of absurdity.

He says that suicide is an admission of incapacity, and such an admission is inconsistent with that military man pride to which Camus openly appeals. Camus states, there is nothing equal to the spectacle of human pride.         Although, much considered an existentialist, Camus had his consume way of thinking and much disagreed with many existentialist thinkers. Camus was a brilliant writer as well as a philosopher and although complicated his views will always be inspiration for hike up thought. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper