DISCLAIMER
These papers are to be use for research/reference purposes only. These papers are provided to help students salvage their own paper. All papers should be used with kosher references.
Canterbury Tales
Introduction
Throughout the Canterbury Tales you guide a sense that Geoffrey Chaucer is careen for the reform of the medieval church. You drop see this in the sort he uses some(prenominal) of his characters to incite some of the negative set of the church into his book. He knew that this would be a risky move, so knowingly he used a frame tale instead of a direct floor or some other method of writing, in which the ideas in the literature would be linked and accredited to him and be used against him by the church. It was heresy to oppose the church in any way, and Im sure he still went though some trouble with the ideas in this book in relation to the church, although the safety net of the frame narrative he uses so well probably helped him. Two characters that illustrated his resistivity to the church and how things were being done are the Pardoner and the wife of bath.
By presenting cardinal problems with the church, Chaucer uses some(prenominal) the Pardoner and the Wife of Bath to oppose the ideas of the church of his time (Chaucer & Pitt-Taylor, 2010, 250-251).
Discussion
First we can compare and contrast the two subjects, the Pardoner and the Wife of Bath. We will look at the similarities first. We can clearly see that the Pardoner and the Wife of Bath both present a criticism of the church of the time. The Pardoner wasnt merely a respected position because they would guilt you into buying a relic from them to pardon your sins. Basically the criticism here...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment