Problems abound with this theory, primarily focusing on how to measure and rank happiness (intellectual versus physical), step versus quality, and a standard of morality that judges acts only by their consequences. These objections are particularly acute in the aforementioned instances.
For example, license is a basic tenet of Western political thought. The regulation of liberty guarantees that all individuals have the right to act (or not to act) as they choose, up until the point their acts invade the rights of others (Popkin and Stroll 142). This warning is the core of democracy in Europe and the United States.
Utilitarianism threatens liberty, though, by its emphasis on the greatest good to the greatest progeny of people. We can envision many instances where a greater score of happiness could be achieved by limiting the liberty of a few. During World War II, the American government interned Japanese-Americans.
This produced tragedy and adversity for the internees, but for many it produced happiness. White farmers bought prime agricultural take cheap, the white
The Utilitarian probably would conclude that more happiness would result from letting the fix go free. After all, the displeasure of many patients who could not be treated by that doctor would outweigh the pain of the victim's family. in time that result defies common sense in the minds of most people. enceinte acts must be punished, regardless of the identity of the actor.
Popkin, Richard H., and Stroll, Avrum. Philosophy make Simple.
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
No comments:
Post a Comment